Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
90.1999.2 • TRPI TI 90.1999.2 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order

Numéro de cause 90.1999.2
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Planning Tribunal considered an appeal filed on December 30, 1999, by a specific appellant against an unspecified decision, although the judgment ultimately declares the appeal inadmissible and orders the appellant to pay court fees and expenses. The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order: The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
notification de la décision frais d'élaboration des plans qualité pour recourir commandement de payer proposition de jugement recours contre des décisions administratives Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
2.

This order imposes the payment of court fees and expenses on the appellant.

1.

This order rules on the outcome of the appeal (which is declared [omitted text]).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.99.00002 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 30 dicembre 1999 di

CE __________ __________ a avv. __________ __________, __________, contro

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario