Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
90.1997.18 • TRPI TI 90.1997.18 Généré par l'IA

Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling

Numéro de cause 90.1997.18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

art. 1, art. 2; Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling: A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
frais d'élaboration des plans émoluments administratifs commandement de payer détermination du for territorial droit foncier qualité pour recourir Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 1
This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.
art. 2
This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 1

This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.

art. 2

This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.97.00018 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

vicecancelliere · Tito Ponti

visto il ricorso del 26 marzo 1997 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario