Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
90.1995.167 • TRPI TI 90.1995.167 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute

Numéro de cause 90.1995.167
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires sans frais
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal on December 28, 1995, challenging the State Council's resolution of November 1995, which approved the zoning plan for a municipality. The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC; Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute: The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
plan d'affectation objet du litige audition des parties retrait de la requête droit d'enlèvement exceptions procédurales tardives Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC
This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.
Généré par l'IA
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1994.249
Appeal Withdrawal Rendering Zoning Dispute Moot
90.1995.28
Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC

This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.95.00167 · Lugano 13 settembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 dicembre 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione del Consiglio di Stato nr. __________del __________novembre 1995 che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 21 marzo 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 15 maggio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 12 settembre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario