Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
90.1994.168 • TRPI TI 90.1994.168 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Finding

Numéro de cause 90.1994.168
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton du Tessin (CH-TI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Frais judiciaires sans frais
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal against the resolution approving a municipality's land-use plan, but subsequently informed the court by letter that they were withdrawing the challenge. The court determined that because the appellant had withdrawn the matter, the case was rendered moot. Consequently, the appeal was removed from the docket, and no court fees or expenses were assessed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Finding: The court determined that because the appellant had withdrawn the matter, the case was rendered moot. Consequently, the appeal was removed from the docket, and no court fees or expenses were assessed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
retrait de la requête décision préjudicielle attaquable annulation de la décision administrative exceptions de procédure droit d'enlèvement réexamen d'une décision antérieure Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
Généré par l'IA
90.2001.25
Withdrawal of Appeal Rendered Case Moot
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1996.67
Appeal Dismissed as Moot Due to Withdrawal of Intent
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1999.76
Appeal Withdrawn Due to Mootness After Factual Clarification

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
2.

This procedural order dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Incarto n. 90.94.00168 · Lugano 8 aprile 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 3 agosto 1992 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 1. luglio 1992 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 24 aprile 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 11 settembre 1992 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 aprile 1998 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________ __________, __________

- Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario