Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2025 9 • VG SZ II 2025 9 Généré par l'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer

Numéro de cause II 2025 9
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant for supplementary benefits was denied coverage because the responsible compensation fund determined that the claimant transferred assets to a third party shortly before applying, leading to an assumption of asset relinquishment without proper justification. The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer: The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Juli 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: