Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2025 61 • VG SZ II 2025 61 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement Following Voluntary Job Cessation

Numéro de cause II 2025 61
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant appealed a decision regarding entitlement to unemployment benefits, stemming from a situation where the appellant ceased employment. The court reasoned that the appellant's termination of employment was due to personal circumstances that did not justify an immediate entitlement to benefits, as the appellant had not fulfilled the necessary conditions or provided sufficient justification under the relevant unemployment insurance law to avoid sanctions for voluntary job loss.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement Following Voluntary Job Cessation: The court reasoned that the appellant's termination of employment was due to personal circumstances that did not justify an immediate entitlement to benefits, as the appellant had not fulfilled the necessary conditions or provided sufficient justification under the relevant unemployment insurance law to avoid sanctions for voluntary job loss.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité de chômage droit aux prestations d'assurance cessation des prestations conditions d'emploi situation personnelle assurance facultative
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 79
Unemployment Benefit Entitlement During Post-Termination Salary Continuation
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 61 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. November 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Unia Arbeitslosenkasse, Kompetenzzentrum D-CH West, Monbijoustrasse 61, Postfach 3398, 3001 Bern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosen­entschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: