Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2025 47 • VG SZ II 2025 47 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2025 47
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the employment office that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits. The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG; Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal: The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage droit aux prestations travail convenable chômage organe de l'assurance-chômage nouvelle demande de prestations d'invalidité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG
The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.
Généré par l'IA
II 2023 77
Claimant v. Labor Office (Unemployment Benefits Suspension Duration)
II 2022 70
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Insufficient Job Search
II 2021 8
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2021 7
Claimant v. Unemployment Benefits Board

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 47 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung,