Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2025 46 • VG SZ II 2025 46 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial for Failure to Attend Required Course

Numéro de cause II 2025 46
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An insured individual appealed a decision regarding unemployment insurance that disallowed benefits due to non-attendance at a required course. The central issue was whether the individual's absence from the mandatory retraining measure, which led to the suspension of insurance benefits, was justified. The court reasoned that the administrative authority was correct in its assessment because the claimant failed to meet the required standard of proof to demonstrate that their non-attendance was unavoidable or otherwise excusable under the relevant regulations governing unemployment insurance and required participation in vocational measures.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial for Failure to Attend Required Course: The central issue was whether the individual's absence from the mandatory retraining measure, which led to the suspension of insurance benefits, was justified. The court reasoned that the administrative authority was correct in its assessment because the claimant failed to meet the required standard of proof to demonstrate that their non-attendance was unavoidable or otherwise excusable under the relevant regulations governing unemployment insurance and required participation in vocational measures.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation d'assurance-chômage prestation pour la fréquentation d'un cours suspension de la prestation d'assurance prestation obligatoire formation dans une nouvelle profession chômage Arbeitslosenversicherung (Kursbesuch) | Arbeitslosenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 46 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Kursbesuch) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: