Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2025 38 • VG SZ II 2025 38 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer

Numéro de cause II 2025 38
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Office for Labor to suspend entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the appellant's refusal of a suitable job offer. The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage travail convenable chômage droit aux prestations interdiction de travailler job sharing

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2020 97
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refused Job Offer Upheld, Period Reduced

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 38 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Pascal Pfeifhofer, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchs­berechtigung wegen Ablehnung einer zumutbaren Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: