Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2024 83 • VG SZ II 2024 83 Généré par l'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment)

Numéro de cause II 2024 83
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal equalization office denying supplementary benefits due to the claimant's failure to divest of assets. The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment): The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fortune prise en considération prestations complémentaires révocation de rentes sociales partage de prévoyance professionnelle dessaisissement dans la faillite omission de prêter secours Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 51
Cantonal Compensation Office Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 30
Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
II 2020 84
Appeal Regarding Imputed Asset Waiver Denial for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 58
Appeal Against Denial of Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputation of Waived Loan as Existing Asset
II 2024 112
Claimant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputed Wealth from Unexplained Asset Decreases

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Andrea Reutter, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: