Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2024 75 • VG SZ II 2024 75 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review

Numéro de cause II 2024 75
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought judicial review of a decision concerning health insurance, specifically challenging the lower court's refusal to entertain the matter. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle de la procédure production de créance assurance maladie allégations de santé réserve d'assurance autorisation de pratiquer à la charge de l'assurance-maladie Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) | Krankenversicherung (ohne med. SV)
Généré par l'IA
ZK1 2021 20
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2018 20
Defendant's Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK1 2022 42
Dismissal of Appeal for Procedural Non-Compliance and Insufficient Substantiation
BEK 2020 115
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2023 15
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance Regarding Spousal Support Modification

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. November 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: