Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2024 45 • VG SZ II 2024 45 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Administrator re: Supplementary Housing Benefit Calculation

Numéro de cause II 2024 45
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the calculation of eligible housing costs, where the initial administrative body maintained a strict interpretation of the housing cost limits applicable to the claimant's situation. The court upheld the lower body's decision, reasoning that the established legal framework clearly defines the maximum reimbursable housing costs, and there was no factual basis or legal justification presented to warrant an exception or deviation from the mandated calculation method for determining the claimant's entitlement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Administrator re: Supplementary Housing Benefit Calculation: The court upheld the lower body's decision, reasoning that the established legal framework clearly defines the maximum reimbursable housing costs, and there was no factual basis or legal justification presented to warrant an exception or deviation from the mandated calculation method for determining the claimant's entitlement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul des prestations complémentaires droit aux prestations frais de logement frais administratifs base de calcul décision-cadre Ergänzungsleistungen (anrechenbare Wohnkosten) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Généré par l'IA
II 2023 94
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Rent Allowance
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2019 39
Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Calculation Based on Flawed Property Valuation.
II 2024 107
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Denial Due to Asset Valuation of Partially Rented Property
II 2020 69
Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Amtsbeiständin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (anrechenbare Wohnkosten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: