Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2024 42 • VG SZ II 2024 42 Généré par l'IA

Property Owners v. Municipality (Development Charges Limitation Period)

Numéro de cause II 2024 42
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Property owners appealed a municipal decision imposing development charges, arguing the claim was time-barred because the underlying authorization had been granted years prior and the development charges were levied after the statutory limitation period had expired. The court determined that the limitation period for imposing such charges begins when the decision granting the construction permit becomes legally binding, and since the administrative act establishing the basis for the charge (the authorization) was finalized before the applicable statute of limitations expired, the claim for the advantage-based development charge was not time-barred and thus upheld the imposition.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Property Owners v. Municipality (Development Charges Limitation Period): The court determined that the limitation period for imposing such charges begins when the decision granting the construction permit becomes legally binding, and since the administrative act establishing the basis for the charge (the authorization) was finalized before the applicable statute of limitations expired, the claim for the advantage-based development charge was not time-barred and thus upheld the imposition.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délais contributions d'équipement base légale promotion immobilière accès au terrain servitude de restriction de bâtir Kausalabgaben (Vorteilsabgaben; Verjährung) | Kausalabgaben
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch … |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Tiefbauamt, Postfach 1251, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Vorteilsabgaben; Verjährung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: