Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2024 22 • VG SZ II 2024 22 Généré par l'IA

Stepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute

Numéro de cause II 2024 22
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant sought the reimbursement of child benefits previously paid and requested supplementary child benefits for a stepdaughter, which an equalization fund denied, leading to an appeal. The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Stepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute: The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit aux prestations complémentaires beaux-parents caisse de compensation droit aux allocations familiales entretien de l'enfant litige d'assurances sociales
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 115
Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income
II 2020 33
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Office (Repayment of Overpaid Benefits Due to Undisclosed Inheritance)
III 2021 187
Employment Status Dispute for Benefit Entitlement
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 22 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n AHV / IV (Rückforderung Kinderrente / Ersuchen um Kinderzusatzrente für Stieftochter) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: