Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2023 89 • VG SZ II 2023 89 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute

Numéro de cause II 2023 89
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the calculation of their insured earnings, specifically disputing the inclusion of certain variable components in the base salary used for calculating daily allowances following a period of unemployment benefit receipt. The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul de l'indemnité de chômage gain assuré obligations contractuelles intéressement des travailleurs fixation du revenu sans invalidité salaire déterminant
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 89 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n