Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2023 83 • VG SZ II 2023 83 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position

Numéro de cause II 2023 83
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought unemployment insurance benefits after terminating their activity, claiming unemployment, but the insurer denied the claim because the appellant was deemed to hold an employer-like position ("arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung") and thus was not considered an insured unemployed person. The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position: The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation d'assurance-chômage chômage entreprise assurée cessation d'emploi position dominante personnes exerçant une activité lucrative
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Dezember 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenent-schädigung; arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: