Compensation Fund v. Company: Supplementary Assessment for Retroactive Salary Contributions
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant company contested a supplementary assessment by the compensation fund for retroactive salary contributions and default interest spanning 2018 to 2021 related to accident insurance. The court determined that the evidence, specifically a salary list provided by the appellant, clearly showed that the previously submitted payroll statements were incorrect regarding the insured salaries, thereby justifying the supplementary assessment issued by the compensation fund.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACompensation Fund v. Company: Supplementary Assessment for Retroactive Salary Contributions: The court determined that the evidence, specifically a salary list provided by the appellant, clearly showed that the previously submitted payroll statements were incorrect regarding the insured salaries, thereby justifying the supplementary assessment issued by the compensation fund.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 73 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. April 2024 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr. B.________ \n und Rechtsanwalt Dr. C.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Gegenstand |\n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Nachzahlungsverfügung Lohnbeiträge und Verzugszinsen 2018-2021) |\n
\n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: