Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2023 72 • VG SZ II 2023 72 Généré par l'IA

Insured Ordered to Repay Maternity Benefits Despite Prior Fund Approval

Numéro de cause II 2023 72
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An insured individual, who had received maternity benefits, was subsequently required by the compensation fund to repay a portion of those benefits due to being employed and receiving salary for the same period, despite having informed the fund of the employment beforehand. The insured appealed this demand for repayment, arguing that the compensation fund's prior approval of the benefit payment despite knowledge of the concurrent employment should prevent the subsequent demand for repayment based on an administrative error or estoppel. The court ultimately ruled against the insured, reasoning that maternity benefits are intended to replace lost earnings and that receiving a salary for the same period constitutes unjust enrichment, thus overriding any potential administrative error or reliance interest on the part of the insured, as the statutory basis for repayment of improperly paid benefits remained intact.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Insured Ordered to Repay Maternity Benefits Despite Prior Fund Approval: The insured appealed this demand for repayment, arguing that the compensation fund's prior approval of the benefit payment despite knowledge of the concurrent employment should prevent the subsequent demand for repayment based on an administrative error or estoppel. The court ultimately ruled against the insured, reasoning that maternity benefits are intended to replace lost earnings and that receiving a salary for the same period constitutes unjust enrichment, thus overriding any potential administrative error or reliance interest on the part of the insured, as the statutory basis for repayment of improperly paid benefits remained intact.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation en cas de maternité paiement des prestations ordre de paiement fonds de compensation enrichissement illégitime prestation d'assurance indue
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 72 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 4. Januar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Mutterschaftsentschädigung / Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: