Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2023 66 • VG SZ II 2023 66 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation

Numéro de cause II 2023 66
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a decision by the Office of Labor that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits following a voluntary resignation from their prior employment without a valid reason. The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation: The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage démission volontaire rapports de travail droit aux prestations chômage droit à la déconnexion
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung;