Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2023 59 • VG SZ II 2023 59 Généré par l'IA

Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment

Numéro de cause II 2023 59
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual residing abroad appealed a decision by a cantonal compensation office regarding old-age and survivors' insurance concerning compensation claims, arguing that the authority failed to consider relevant evidence submitted in the appeal proceedings, specifically documentation supporting the claimed residence abroad and subsequent employment abroad, which should have been included in the administrative file. The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal on Old-Age Insurance Regarding Belated Submission of Evidence of Foreign Residence and Employment: The court reasoned that the appellant had failed to provide timely or complete documentation regarding their asserted change of circumstances and residence abroad during the administrative proceedings before the first instance, and thus the appellate authority was not obliged to revisit the matter or accept the belated submission of evidence without proper justification, affirming the previous ruling.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assurance-vieillesse et survivants indemnité d'assurance changement de résidence procédure en assurances sociales rente étrangère décision étrangère

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the court fees for the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Dubai - UAE, Zustelladresse: B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz nach