Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2023 18 • VG SZ II 2023 18 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment

Numéro de cause II 2023 18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a decision that suspended their entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the refusal to accept a job assignment. The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment: The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage droit aux prestations chômage offre d'emploi violation d'obligations contractuelles de travail interdiction de la cession
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 5
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Assigned Job
II 2023 15
Unemployment Benefit Sanction Upheld for Refusal of Assigned Job
II 2021 59
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Non-Compliance with Job Application Instruction

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtannahme einer zugewiesenen Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: