Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2023 102 • VG SZ II 2023 102 Généré par l'IA

Tax Authority Security Order Admissibility Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2023 102
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, a corporation, contested a security order issued by the tax authority concerning direct federal taxes for the years 2020 to 2023, involving profit and capital tax. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the appeal was inadmissible because the prerequisite for filing an appeal—that the challenged decision must directly and immediately affect the appellant's legal rights—was not met, as the security order merely secured an existing tax claim that had not yet been finally determined or assessed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Tax Authority Security Order Admissibility Appeal: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the appeal was inadmissible because the prerequisite for filing an appeal—that the challenged decision must directly and immediately affect the appellant's legal rights—was not met, as the security order merely secured an existing tax claim that had not yet been finally determined or assessed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
sûretés en matière d'impôts autorité fiscale impôt sur les sociétés impôt direct droit au gain décision anticipée en matière fiscale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was applied to decide on the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 30
Tax Security Order Appeal Validity
BEK 2021 170
Corporation Appeal of Seizure Order Inadmissible
II 2024 97
Taxpayer Appeal Dismissed Against Security Order for Tax Arrears Due to Concealed Domicile and Risk of Claim Collection
BEK 2020 66
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization for Tax Claim
II 2024 6
Taxpayer Appeal Regarding Asset Classification for Direct Federal Tax

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was applied to decide on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 102 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. HSG B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Finanzen, Inkasso, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1231, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Gewinnund Kapitalsteuer (Sicherstellungsverfügung Direkte \n Bundessteuer 2020 bis 2023) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: