Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 88 • VG SZ II 2022 88 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied

Numéro de cause II 2022 88
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought reinstatement of the deadline to appeal a decision concerning unemployment insurance benefits, specifically regarding short-time work compensation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, after missing the original appeal period. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied: The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
rétablissement des indemnités chômage inobservation du délai indemnité en cas de travail réduit prestation statutaire chômage délais de recours
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 61
Company Appeal Regarding COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Denial
II 2021 112
Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 47
Company Appeal Regarding Denial of COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Due to Insufficient Documentation
II 2021 15
Company Appeal on Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 3
COVID-19 Unemployment Benefits Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 88 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Covid-19; Kurzarbeitsentschädigung; Fristwiederherstellung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: