Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 87 • VG SZ II 2022 87 Généré par l'IA

Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits)

Numéro de cause II 2022 87
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner, who was receiving supplementary benefits, was required to transfer ownership of a property to the compensation fund as a condition for receiving those benefits, despite having previously argued that the transfer was unjustified due to an alleged agreement to keep the asset. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits): The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transmission de la propriété prestations complémentaires fonds de compensation condition légale condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance convention de libre passage Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2019 75
Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 87 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: