Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 77 • VG SZ II 2022 77 Généré par l'IA

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss

Numéro de cause II 2022 77
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A company sought reimbursement under the COVID-19 loss of earnings compensation scheme, but the responsible equalization fund denied the claim because the company had not submitted the required documentation demonstrating the pandemic-related loss of income. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité pour perte de gain recours de l'assureur soulte révision de la caisse caisse-maladie non reconnue preuve de solvabilité Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
Généré par l'IA
II 2022 64
Employer Reimbursement Denial for Lost Earnings Due to COVID-19 Measures Causation Dispute
II 2022 41
Claimant v. Compensation Fund: Denial of COVID-19 Earnings Replacement Benefits
II 2022 76
Cultural Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Loss Compensation
II 2020 59
Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)
II 2021 109
Company Reimbursement Claim for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Allowance Upheld

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: