Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 62 • VG SZ II 2022 62 Généré par l'IA

Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees

Numéro de cause II 2022 62
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A company appealed a municipal council's decision imposing connection fees for a new sewage system installation, arguing the fees were improperly calculated. The court reasoned that the fees levied by the municipality, intended to cover the costs of providing the public service, were permissible as "causal contributions" under relevant law, provided they adhered to the principle of proportionality and equitable burden sharing among users, thus upholding the local authority's imposition of the connection charges.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees: The court reasoned that the fees levied by the municipality, intended to cover the costs of providing the public service, were permissible as "causal contributions" under relevant law, provided they adhered to the principle of proportionality and equitable burden sharing among users, thus upholding the local authority's imposition of the connection charges.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
taxes de raccordement aux canalisations proportionnalité mise à la charge des émoluments collectivité locale obligation communale servitude de conduite Kausalabgaben (Anschlussgebühren Kanalisation Neubau) | Kausalabgaben
Généré par l'IA
III 2023 10
Property Owner v. Municipality on Sewage Connection Fee Assessment
II 2023 29
Challenge to Sewage Connection Fees Based on Benefit Equalization
II 2010 50
Appeal Regarding Development Contributions for Electrical and Sewage Infrastructure Costs.
II 2018 4
Property Owner v. Municipal Council (Sewage and Refuse Fees Assessment)
II 2017 108
Sewage Fee and Permit Fee Appeal on Building Modifications

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 62 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat U.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Anschlussgebühren Kanalisation Neubau) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: