Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2022 59 • VG SZ II 2022 59 Généré par l'IA

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute

Numéro de cause II 2022 59
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their disability pension under a mandatory occupational pension scheme, specifically challenging the degree of disability (IV-Grad) used for the calculation. The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixation de rente d'invalidité régime de retraite litige d'assurances sociales critères d'appréciation prévoyance obligatoire assurance d'invalidité
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 14. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Invalidenrente: Berechnung IV-Grad) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: