Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 56 • VG SZ II 2022 56 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Denial

Numéro de cause II 2022 56
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the decision of a compensation fund regarding supplementary benefits. The appellant was denied supplementary benefits based on an objection decision dated June 3, 2022. The court, in its decision of October 19, 2022, reached its verdict after reviewing the facts presented in the case concerning the supplementary benefits claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Denial: The appellant was denied supplementary benefits based on an objection decision dated June 3, 2022. The court, in its decision of October 19, 2022, reached its verdict after reviewing the facts presented in the case concerning the supplementary benefits claim.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations complémentaires fonds de compensation renaissance du droit à la prestation d'assurance procédure en assurances sociales condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance révision de prestations d'invalidité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article governed the imposition of court costs on the losing party.
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 9
Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings
II 2020 69
Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal
II 2018 85
Appeal of Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Hypothetical Income
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2023 94
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Rent Allowance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article governed the imposition of court costs on the losing party.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 56 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Oxana Straub, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Einspracheentscheid vom 3. Juni 2022) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: