Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 48 • VG SZ II 2022 48 Généré par l'IA

Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits

Numéro de cause II 2022 48
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, a recipient of supplementary benefits, challenged the decision of the cantonal compensation fund to offset assumed family law maintenance payments against her benefits, as the payments were deemed to be in arrears and not actually received or used for the intended purpose of supporting the recipient. The court reasoned that for such payments to be considered as actual income and thus reduce supplementary benefits, the claimant must have a genuine, enforceable right to receive the maintenance payments, and these payments must be effectively made or available to the claimant to cover their needs, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the alleged arrears.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that for such payments to be considered as actual income and thus reduce supplementary benefits, the claimant must have a genuine, enforceable right to receive the maintenance payments, and these payments must be effectively made or available to the claimant to cover their needs, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the alleged arrears.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arriérés de pensions alimentaires paiement des prestations prestation familiale fonds de compensation indemnité pour inconvénients contentieux de sécurité sociale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG
The appeal is rejected on the grounds set out in Art. 65 para. 2 BGG regarding the merits of the case.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
II 2024 104
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Family Law Maintenance Imputation
II 2022 74
Appeal on Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Maintenance Deduction and Imputed Rental Income
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2021 115
Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income
II 2022 83
Supplementary Benefits Denial Upheld Despite Recalculated Usufruct Value

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG

The appeal is rejected on the grounds set out in Art. 65 para. 2 BGG regarding the merits of the case.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 48 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch ihre Mutter B.________, ebenda, \n diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung familienrechtlicher Unterhaltsbeiträge) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: