Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2022 4 • VG SZ II 2022 4 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Overpayment Recovery Due to Failure to Report Earnings

Numéro de cause II 2022 4
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant, having received unemployment benefits, subsequently secured interim employment and failed to report the resulting earnings to the unemployment fund, leading to an overpayment of benefits which the fund sought to recover. The court reasoned that the claimant has a duty to inform the unemployment insurance provider immediately of any change in circumstances that affects the right to or amount of benefits, specifically including the commencement of employment and the associated earnings, and that failure to do so justifies the fund's subsequent demand for repayment of the improperly paid daily allowances, as the claimant was obligated to avoid the overpayment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Overpayment Recovery Due to Failure to Report Earnings: The court reasoned that the claimant has a duty to inform the unemployment insurance provider immediately of any change in circumstances that affects the right to or amount of benefits, specifically including the commencement of employment and the associated earnings, and that failure to do so justifies the fund's subsequent demand for repayment of the improperly paid daily allowances, as the claimant was obligated to avoid the overpayment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
perception indue d'indemnités de chômage changement d'emploi chômage indemnité pour perte de gain perception de prestation indemnités chômage des dirigeants
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Rückforderung zu viel geleisteter Taggelder; Zwischenverdienst) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: