Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2022 22 • VG SZ II 2022 22 Généré par l'IA

COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Compensation for Business Closure

Numéro de cause II 2022 22
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A complainant sought entitlement to compensation payments under the COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Ordinance due to business closure, arguing that the resulting loss of income qualified them for benefits despite having other income sources. The court reasoned that the ordinance's purpose was to compensate for losses directly attributable to mandated business closure related to the pandemic, and since the complainant's specific business activity was halted by official decree, the loss of income stemming from that closure, irrespective of other existing income streams, justified the compensation entitlement under the relevant statutory provisions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; COVID-19 Earned Income Replacement Compensation for Business Closure: The court reasoned that the ordinance's purpose was to compensate for losses directly attributable to mandated business closure related to the pandemic, and since the complainant's specific business activity was halted by official decree, the loss of income stemming from that closure, irrespective of other existing income streams, justified the compensation entitlement under the relevant statutory provisions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
revenu acquis en compensation fermeture d'entreprise droit à l'indemnisation vie de l'entreprise prestation statutaire cessation de l'activité lucrative Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

The appeal was dismissed, and thus the appellant must bear the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 22 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: