Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2022 20 • VG SZ II 2022 20 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Job

Numéro de cause II 2022 20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual appealed a decision by the relevant labor authority that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits due to the failure to follow an instruction regarding labor market measures. The court ultimately upheld the suspension, reasoning that the appellant did not sufficiently justify their failure to comply with the repeated instruction to apply for a specific vacant position, thereby violating the obligation to actively participate in measures aimed at reintegration into the labor market, which warranted the imposed sanction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Job: The court ultimately upheld the suspension, reasoning that the appellant did not sufficiently justify their failure to comply with the repeated instruction to apply for a specific vacant position, thereby violating the obligation to actively participate in measures aimed at reintegration into the labor market, which warranted the imposed sanction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage droit aux prestations chômage aides à l'emploi organe de l'assurance-chômage nouvelle demande de prestations d'invalidité
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Arbeitsmarktliche Massnahmen; \n Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtbefolgung einer Weisung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: