Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 18 • VG SZ II 2022 18 Généré par l'IA

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure

Numéro de cause II 2022 18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A foundation providing flexible early retirement benefits in the main construction industry sued a limited liability company for a contractual penalty related to occupational pension obligations. The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure: The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
clause pénale fondation de prévoyance société à responsabilité limitée retraite anticipée fondation entreprises de construction Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) | Berufliche Vorsorge (ohne med. SV)
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 55
Foundation for Flexible Retirement v. Limited Liability Company (Collective Agreement Contributions)
II 2022 21
Pension Fund v. Construction Company (Non-Submission of Payroll Declaration)
II 2019 89
LLC Appeal on Pension Contributions and Stay of Execution
II 2019 23
Pension Fund v. Limited Liability Company: Occupational Pension Insurance Obligation
II 2018 107
Pension Institution v. Employer: Recovery of Unpaid Pension Contributions

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Stiftung für den flexiblen Altersrücktritt im Bauhauptgewerbe (FAR), Obstgartenstrasse 19, 8006 Zürich, \n Klägerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: