Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2022 16 • VG SZ II 2022 16 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Numéro de cause II 2022 16
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant sought supplementary benefits, which involved scrutiny over a prior waiver of assets, leading to a second instance appeal against the decision of the compensation office. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations complémentaires fortune prise en considération condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance indemnité pleine et entière moyens financiers restitution de prestations

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

This provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 16 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht; 2. Rechtsgang \n im Verfahren II 2021 44) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: