Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2022 10 • VG SZ II 2022 10 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations

Numéro de cause II 2022 10
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual appealed a decision by the labor office to cease unemployment insurance entitlement, where the core issue was whether the claimant had fulfilled their obligations while receiving benefits. The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations: The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
violation d'obligations contractuelles de travail droit aux prestations suppression des prestations d'assurance assurance chômage chômage travail convenable
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2023 90
Unemployment Benefits Cessation for Insufficient Pre-Claim Job Search Efforts

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 10 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: