Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 98 • VG SZ II 2021 98 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer

Numéro de cause II 2021 98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a decision to suspend their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits for failing to accept a job offer. The court reasoned that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient justification for refusing the offered position, as the provided job was suitable under the relevant unemployment insurance regulations, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend the benefit payments.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient justification for refusing the offered position, as the provided job was suitable under the relevant unemployment insurance regulations, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend the benefit payments.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suspension des indemnités de chômage droit aux prestations offre d'emploi chômage aides à l'emploi protection contre les congés
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2023 18
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2022 20
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Job

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 98 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. November 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Simone Höfliger, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtannahme einer zugewiesenen Stelle) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: