Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 96 • VG SZ II 2021 96 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution

Numéro de cause II 2021 96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a social insurance institution's decision regarding survivors' benefits and a claim for damages under the Old Age and Survivors' Insurance scheme. The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Dismissed: Survivors' Benefits and Damages Claim Against Social Insurance Institution: The claimant, appealing an earlier decision, challenged the administrative actions concerning the survivor's benefits and sought compensation for alleged damages. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the prior ruling, based on its interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions governing the insurance benefits and the lack of grounds to substantiate the claim for damages against the administrative body.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assurance de survivants prestation d'assurance sociale action en indemnité assurance-vieillesse renaissance du droit à la prestation d'assurance prestation statutaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because the appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 96 + 97 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ \n (Verfahren II 2021 96) |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Sozialversicherungsanstalt (SVA) Zürich, Röntgenstrasse 17, Postfach, 8087 Zürich, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz gemäss