Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 9 • VG SZ II 2021 9 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings

Numéro de cause II 2021 9
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought supplementary benefits and subsequently requested legal aid for the second instance of the appeal proceedings concerning the denial of those benefits. The lower court ruled against granting free legal aid, leading the party to appeal that decision. The court reasoned that the previous decision regarding the supplementary benefits was not so clearly favorable to the appellant that the refusal to grant legal aid could be deemed clearly incorrect, and since the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that they would be unable to bear the costs of the proceedings otherwise, the appeal against the denial of free legal aid was dismissed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Free Legal Aid for Supplementary Benefits Proceedings: The lower court ruled against granting free legal aid, leading the party to appeal that decision. The court reasoned that the previous decision regarding the supplementary benefits was not so clearly favorable to the appellant that the refusal to grant legal aid could be deemed clearly incorrect, and since the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that they would be unable to bear the costs of the proceedings otherwise, the appeal against the denial of free legal aid was dismissed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure d'assistance judiciaire prestation complémentaire procédure directrice obtention frauduleuse d'une prestation suppression de l'aide sociale qualité pour recourir
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren II 2020 50: \n Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: