Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 76 • VG SZ II 2021 76 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)

Numéro de cause II 2021 76
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An insured individual appealed a decision by the employment office to discontinue unemployment benefits due to insufficient job search efforts. The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute): The court reviewed the evidence concerning the claimant's reported job search activities and determined that the provided documentation failed to substantiate the required active efforts to secure employment within the specified period. Consequently, the court upheld the administrative decision, finding that the claimant did not meet the statutory obligations regarding active job seeking, which justified the cessation of benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité de chômage cessation des prestations obligation de chercher du travail droit à la prestation d'assurance perte d'emploi causée chômage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 24
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefits Cessation
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appeal concerns a final decision that is not subject to appeal.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung; ungenügende Arbeits-bemühungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: