Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 75 • VG SZ II 2021 75 Généré par l'IA

Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision Upheld in Insurance Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2021 75
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a decision by a cantonal compensation fund regarding a claim for old-age and survivor's insurance, specifically related to damages. The court ultimately upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the appeal lacked merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the initial determination by the compensation fund regarding the insurance matter was legally flawed or factually incorrect.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVG; Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision Upheld in Insurance Appeal: The court ultimately upheld the fund's decision, reasoning that the appeal lacked merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the initial determination by the compensation fund regarding the insurance matter was legally flawed or factually incorrect.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
caisse d'assurance assurance-vieillesse assurance de survivants litige d'assurances sociales décision justifiée de l'assureur action directe contre l'assureur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVG
Costs were imposed based on this provision, as indicated in the dispositive part (Order 3).
Généré par l'IA
I 2018 10
Appeal Against Cantonal Insurance Office and Compensation Fund Rulings
I 2017 77
Appeal Against Cantonal Social Insurance Decision on Disability Benefits
II 2021 51
Cantonal Compensation Office Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
III 2025 41
Appeal Against Cantonal Health Benefit Entitlement Decision Dismissed
II 2024 98
Old-Age Insurance Damages Appeal Decision Overturned

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVG

Costs were imposed based on this provision, as indicated in the dispositive part (Order 3).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. November 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Altersund Hinterlassenenversicherung (Schadenersatz \n gemäss