Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 71 • VG SZ II 2021 71 Généré par l'IA

Claimant Insured Status and Premium Obligation Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2021 71
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant challenged a decision regarding their insured status and a resulting premium demand. The court reviewed whether the claimant qualified as an insured person under the relevant insurance law, considering facts presented in the lower court's decision, and ultimately upheld the prior ruling, confirming the claimant's insured status and the associated premium obligation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Claimant Insured Status and Premium Obligation Appeal: The court reviewed whether the claimant qualified as an insured person under the relevant insurance law, considering facts presented in the lower court's decision, and ultimately upheld the prior ruling, confirming the claimant's insured status and the associated premium obligation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
qualité d'assuré prime d'assurance subrogation de l'assureur droit des obligations condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance litige d'assurances sociales Versicherteneigenschaft; Prämienforderung | Verschiedenes

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appeal was partially dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs of the successful party.
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 91
Premium Reduction Eligibility Appeal
ZK1 2017 3
Life Insurance Policy Validity Dispute Appeal
II 2020 95
Claimant v. Insurer: Health Insurance Premium Arrears Enforcement
I 2020 23
Insured v. Insurance Company: Denial of Disability Benefits Appeal
I 2020 70
Insured v. Insurer (Accident Benefits Denial Reversal)

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal was partially dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs of the successful party.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 71 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Simone Höfliger, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Suva, Versicherungstechnik, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. B.________, \n2. C.________, \n3. D.________, \n4. E.________, \n5. F.________, \n6. G.________, \n7. H.________, \n Beigeladene, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Versicherteneigenschaft; Prämienforderung |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: