Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 69 • VG SZ II 2021 69 Généré par l'IA

Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Disallowance of Professional Expense Deductions

Numéro de cause II 2021 69
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Taxpayers appealed their 2018 income tax assessment, specifically contesting the disallowance of professional expense deductions. The core issue before the court was whether certain expenses claimed by the taxpayers for the relevant tax year qualified as necessary professional expenses deductible under tax law. The court reasoned that since the expenses lacked sufficient documentation or a direct, demonstrable link to the generation of taxable income as required by the relevant tax provisions, the initial decision by the tax authorities to deny the deductions was justified, thereby upholding the contested assessment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Disallowance of Professional Expense Deductions: The core issue before the court was whether certain expenses claimed by the taxpayers for the relevant tax year qualified as necessary professional expenses deductible under tax law. The court reasoned that since the expenses lacked sufficient documentation or a direct, demonstrable link to the generation of taxable income as required by the relevant tax provisions, the initial decision by the tax authorities to deny the deductions was justified, thereby upholding the contested assessment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
déduction des frais professionnels taxation de l'impôt sur le revenu autorité fiscale dispositions fiscales décision anticipée en matière fiscale revenu suffisant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Dezember 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission / Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Veranlagung 2018: \n Berufskosten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: