Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 66 • VG SZ II 2021 66 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof

Numéro de cause II 2021 66
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging a decision by a lower court regarding a claim for unemployment insurance contributions, where the appellant argued that the employment relationship had ended before the period for which contributions were assessed. The court reasoned that the evidence failed to conclusively establish that the employment relationship had terminated before the relevant date, upholding the lower court's decision because the appellant did not sufficiently demonstrate the termination of the employment contract as required by law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof: The court reasoned that the evidence failed to conclusively establish that the employment relationship had terminated before the relevant date, upholding the lower court's decision because the appellant did not sufficiently demonstrate the termination of the employment contract as required by law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cessation d'emploi assurance chômage chômage créance de cotisation aides à l'emploi rapport d'assurance Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 51
Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 102
Unemployment Insurance Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 60
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Salary Payments

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, St. Gallerstrasse 24, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n GastroSocial Ausgleichskasse, Buchserstrasse 1, \n Postfach 2203, 5001 Aarau, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n