Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 39 • VG SZ II 2021 39 Généré par l'IA

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans

Numéro de cause II 2021 39
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A holding company appealed the tax assessment for 2017 regarding the refusal to recognize value adjustments as tax-deductible expenses for profit and capital tax purposes. The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Holding Company v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Value Adjustments on Intercompany Loans: The court addressed whether the holding company could deduct value adjustments on intercompany loans that were fully covered by provisions, as the underlying receivable, though written down, was not legally irrecoverable, and the tax authority was correct in disallowing the deduction because the adjustments did not represent a realized loss or a definitive diminishment of value as required for tax deductibility under the applicable law at the time.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
régularisation des déductions impôt sur le capital autorité fiscale taxations fiscales société holding gain manqué
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n

\n \n Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Schwyz \n Kammer II \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 39 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ Holding AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch …, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Gewinnund Kapitalsteuer (Veranlagung 2017; Aufrechnung Wertberichtigungen) |\n \n\n

\n

\n Sachverhalt: