Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 30 • VG SZ II 2021 30 Généré par l'IA

Social Security Fund Appeal Regarding Investment Income Crediting

Numéro de cause II 2021 30
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by a social security fund regarding supplementary benefits, specifically the crediting of investment income against the entitlement. The appellant challenged the fund's calculation which included investment income when determining eligibility for supplementary benefits. The court ultimately upheld the lower instance's decision, reasoning that under the relevant law, income derived from assets, including investment income, must be considered when calculating the claimant's available resources to determine the final supplementary benefit amount.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Social Security Fund Appeal Regarding Investment Income Crediting: The appellant challenged the fund's calculation which included investment income when determining eligibility for supplementary benefits. The court ultimately upheld the lower instance's decision, reasoning that under the relevant law, income derived from assets, including investment income, must be considered when calculating the claimant's available resources to determine the final supplementary benefit amount.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations de sécurité sociale revenu de la fortune fonds en valeurs mobilières bonification supplémentaire litige d'assurances sociales droit aux prestations complémentaires Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung von Vermögen) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial review proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 30 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marcel Käselau, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung von Vermögensertrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: