Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 126 • VG SZ II 2021 126 Généré par l'IA

Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Capital Gain from Isolated Sale of Immovable Property

Numéro de cause II 2021 126
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Taxpayers appealed their 2017 income and asset tax assessment concerning the tax treatment of a significant capital gain realized upon the sale of real estate, where the dispute centered on whether the profit qualified as income from movable or immovable property for taxation purposes. The court reasoned that since the real estate was held for purely private purposes and the sale was an isolated transaction not constituting commercial real estate dealing, the capital gain derived from the sale of immovable property was subject to cantonal and communal property gains tax regulations, and therefore, the specific tax treatment sought by the taxpayers, treating it as income from movable assets, was not permissible under the relevant tax law framework.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStV; Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Capital Gain from Isolated Sale of Immovable Property: The court reasoned that since the real estate was held for purely private purposes and the sale was an isolated transaction not constituting commercial real estate dealing, the capital gain derived from the sale of immovable property was subject to cantonal and communal property gains tax regulations, and therefore, the specific tax treatment sought by the taxpayers, treating it as income from movable assets, was not permissible under the relevant tax law framework.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
gain immobilier vente commerciale taxations fiscales impôt foncier autorité fiscale impôt réel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStV

Costs were imposed on the appellant according to this provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 126 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kantonale Steuerkommission/Kantonale Verwaltung für die direkte Bundessteuer, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1232, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einkommensund Vermögenssteuer (Veranlagung 2017) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: