Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2021 124 • VG SZ II 2021 124 Généré par l'IA

Mandatory Health Insurer Not Obligated to Cover Narcotics Control Fee Without Explicit Statutory Inclusion

Numéro de cause II 2021 124
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over an insurance provider's obligation to cover the costs of a "control fee for narcotics according to ALT" related to medical treatment. The insured party sought reimbursement for these costs from their mandatory health insurer. The court reasoned that the specific regulation cited, which covers the fee for monitoring controlled substances, must be read in conjunction with the underlying legal framework defining covered medical services; absent a clear stipulation within the mandatory health insurance law or its implementing ordinances that explicitly includes this specific administrative control fee as a reimbursable benefit, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expense, despite its potential necessity for administering prescribed medication.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Mandatory Health Insurer Not Obligated to Cover Narcotics Control Fee Without Explicit Statutory Inclusion: The insured party sought reimbursement for these costs from their mandatory health insurer. The court reasoned that the specific regulation cited, which covers the fee for monitoring controlled substances, must be read in conjunction with the underlying legal framework defining covered medical services; absent a clear stipulation within the mandatory health insurance law or its implementing ordinances that explicitly includes this specific administrative control fee as a reimbursable benefit, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expense, despite its potential necessity for administering prescribed medication.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de l'assurance-maladie assurance obligatoire des soins surassurance émolument administratif traitement médical libération de l'assureur
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 124 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Kostenübernahme 'Kontrollgebühr Betäubungsmittel gemäss ALT') |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: