Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 121 • VG SZ II 2021 121 Généré par l'IA

Occupational Pension Benefit Calculation Dispute

Numéro de cause II 2021 121
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the amount of a pension benefit under a mandatory occupational benefit scheme, where the claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of her retirement pension. The court reasoned that the calculation of the vested benefits and the resulting pension was correct according to the applicable regulations governing occupational pensions, as the lower court's application of the statutory minimum standards and relevant plan provisions adequately determined the benefit amount in question.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Occupational Pension Benefit Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the calculation of the vested benefits and the resulting pension was correct according to the applicable regulations governing occupational pensions, as the lower court's application of the statutory minimum standards and relevant plan provisions adequately determined the benefit amount in question.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations de prévoyance professionnelle calcul de la prestation prestation obligatoire responsabilité de l'institution de prévoyance décisions en matière de pension de retraite rente minimale Berufliche Vorsorge (Höhe der Rente) | Berufliche Vorsorge (ohne med. SV)
Généré par l'IA
I 2018 112
Occupational Pension Benefit Dispute
I 2016 83
Pension Fund Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute
II 2022 33
Pension Fund Over-Indemnification Calculation Dispute
II 2022 59
Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute
II 2019 91
Pension Fund v. Employer: Occupational Pension Contributions Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 121 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 18. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Stiftung C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Höhe der Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: