Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2021 115 • VG SZ II 2021 115 Généré par l'IA

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income

Numéro de cause II 2021 115
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought supplementary benefits but was later required to repay a portion of the benefits received after the relevant income assessment period, as the initial calculation did not account for subsequent income earned during that period. The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Supplementary Benefit Repayment Based on Subsequent Income: The court reasoned that the obligation to repay supplementary benefits arises when the beneficiary receives income that, had it been known at the time of the benefit calculation, would have resulted in a lower benefit payment or no entitlement at all, thus upholding the administrative decision to reclaim the overpaid amount based on the subsequent income realization.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit aux prestations complémentaires calcul de la prestation fixation du revenu restitution des indemnités de chômage rémunération du travail maintien du paiement du salaire Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2018 33
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Hypothetical Income Imputation for Non-Working Spouse
II 2021 88
Spousal Income Imputation in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2020 33
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Office (Repayment of Overpaid Benefits Due to Undisclosed Inheritance)
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2021 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: