Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 86 • VG SZ II 2020 86 Généré par l'IA

Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits

Numéro de cause II 2020 86
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerns a claim for supplementary benefits where the claimant appealed a decision regarding the mandatory waiver of assets. The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits: The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, an applicant who has relinquished assets (a voluntary transfer of ownership, in this case, a house) must demonstrate that the transfer was not made to obtain the benefit, and if the transfer was made within the legally stipulated timeframe preceding the benefit application, the burden of proof shifts to the applicant to show that the disposal was not made for the purpose of obtaining benefits, which the applicant failed to do.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations complémentaires transfert de patrimoine renonciation aux prestations d'assurance preuve de propriété fardeau de la preuve non-cumul des prestations Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.
Généré par l'IA
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because her appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: